Humankind: a takedown

There’s a damning and in-depth review of the anthropology used in the new pop-culture book Humankind: A Hopeful History. It appears to reveal that the book rests on some very shoddy foundations. The review comes from the right, not the left.

Further, I had not been aware — from the other reviews of it I had read — that the book champions Rousseau, of all people… “Bregman is nevertheless convinced that he was a great thinker who is still highly relevant today”. If an author champions a madman like Rousseau then that instantly indicates that his book is probably worthless, in my view.

Judging by this review, in the coming weeks and months we might expect others to give this lightweight book a more in-depth take-down and fisking. As such it’s probably not a book to be idly recommended to others, as being a popular exemplar of ‘the new optimism’.